<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Photography Tip: &#8220;Exposure Stacking&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outdoorexposurephoto.com/photoblog/digital-photography-tips/21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outdoorexposurephoto.com/photoblog/digital-photography-tips/21/</link>
	<description>Fine art landscape, nature and travel photography by Sean Bagshaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:02:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Bagshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.outdoorexposurephoto.com/photoblog/digital-photography-tips/21/comment-page-1/#comment-15674</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Bagshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outdoorexposurephoto.com/photoblog/digital-photography-tips/21/#comment-15674</guid>
		<description>Hi Jerry,

Thanks for your comment and question. This is similar to the way that HDR software combines multiple exposures to extend the dynamic range that can be contained in a single image, but not exactly the same.  I find that I have much better control over the final look of the image and have much fewer issues with noise, digital artifacts and effects that look less than natural. I have refined my techniques quite a bit since I initially wrote this blog article. I encourage you to read some of my other posts as well as articles that I write for www.PhotoCascadia.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jerry,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment and question. This is similar to the way that HDR software combines multiple exposures to extend the dynamic range that can be contained in a single image, but not exactly the same.  I find that I have much better control over the final look of the image and have much fewer issues with noise, digital artifacts and effects that look less than natural. I have refined my techniques quite a bit since I initially wrote this blog article. I encourage you to read some of my other posts as well as articles that I write for <a href="http://www.PhotoCascadia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.PhotoCascadia.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.outdoorexposurephoto.com/photoblog/digital-photography-tips/21/comment-page-1/#comment-15297</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outdoorexposurephoto.com/photoblog/digital-photography-tips/21/#comment-15297</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this the same as HDR imaging? I take HDR shots a fair amount of the time and it&#039;s pretty much the same thing and less time is needed since the HDR program I use does all the merging for me. Just curious because I was looking for a better technique and saw the term stacking when I was checking out photographs at astronomy.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this the same as HDR imaging? I take HDR shots a fair amount of the time and it&#8217;s pretty much the same thing and less time is needed since the HDR program I use does all the merging for me. Just curious because I was looking for a better technique and saw the term stacking when I was checking out photographs at astronomy.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

