Sean Bagshaw Outdoor Exposure Photography

Images from the edge

See all image results...

Search Criteria
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Content Type
Select all
Search Posts
Search Prints & Stock Photos
Search Events
Search Pages
  • About
    • Sean’s Biography
    • A Look Through My Lens
    • Social Media
    • Alliances
    • Sign Up For My Newsletter
    • Website Tour
    • Interviews And Podcasts
    • CV
  • Tutorials & TK Photoshop Plugins
  • Learn Nature Photography
  • Videos From My YouTube Channel
  • Signed Prints
    • Favorites Of 2023
    • OREGON
    • CANYONS AND RIVERS
    • CITYSCAPES
    • COASTAL
    • DESERTS AND PRAIRIES
    • FLOWERS AND PLANTS
    • FORESTS AND TREES
    • MOUNTAINS AND LAKES
    • NATIONAL PARKS
    • STREAMS AND WATERFALLS
  • PRINT OPTIONS
  • Stock Photography
    • OREGON
    • NORTH AMERICA
    • THE REST OF THE WORLD
    • AGRICULTURE AND VINEYARD
    • BUILT BY PEOPLE
    • NATURAL BEAUTY
    • OUTDOOR AND ADVENTURE
  • Books & Calendars
    • Calendars
    • Washington Evergreen
    • Oregon, My Oregon
    • Photographing Through The Seasons
  • Workshops
  • Events
  • Photography Blog
  • Contact
  •  

Digital Photo Tip: Organizing Your Digital Images

March 27, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw Leave a Comment

As more and more people are discovering, digital photography opens the floodgates for lots and lots of picture taking. There was a time when I wanted to take more photos, but cost of film and developing, plus the hassle of dropping off, picking up and dealing with tons of prints or slides kept my shooting sporadic at best. These days I find I have the opposite problem. My camera goes along with me pretty much everywhere and I can shoot when the conditions aren’t perfect or just to experiment and have fun without concern about the cost, piles of slides building up or guilt for being wasteful. The recent explosion of very accomplished digital photographers is testimony to how many people are shooting a ton and getting good quickly.

All this prolific creativity does have its downsides, the most common being trying to manage and organize gigabytes worth of image files that are overflowing your hard drives. Without an image management system you will soon have a photo collection that is about as useful as a library in which all the book pages have been torn out and stored in a large pile in the center of the room. There are unlimited systems that could work well for indexing and organizing large quantities of image files. There isn’t one correct way to do it, just as long as you find a system that works for you and you actually put it to use.

My system is by no means perfect, but I generally make good use of my hard drive space and can find images without too much effort. Here are my top 10 tips for managing a digital photo collection.

1. Download images from your camera to your computer often. After months or years of sitting on your memory card in your camera, images are more likely to be forgotten and deleted to make more space when the card fills up. I usually download images after any photo session and then format the card so it is empty for the next photo session.
2. Initially put images in “delete and edit” folders. I have about ten numbered “delete and edit” folders into which I download images right from the camera. I know that images in these folders are awaiting processing and require my attention before they can be filed away into my larger archiving system. If I put images directly into my filing system then I forget they are there and never do any deleting or editing.
3. Be merciless about deleting images. Before moving images out of your “delete and edit” folders to your filing system, trash can any image that isn’t great, isn’t sentimental, isn’t useful or has one or more close duplicates. There is a tendency to save every single image we take. Be strong and hit the delete button on all images that won’t stand the test of time. It is also a good idea to go back through your filing system from time to time and further purge photos. You’ll save tons of memory space in the long run and you won’t have to search through so many dogs to find your winners.
4. Leave the original images unchanged and save any cropped or enhanced photos under a new name or file type. If you are going to do any enhancing to your photos, such as color adjustments, cropping or other “Photoshopping”, make sure to save the enhanced “master” version with a slightly different filename so you don’t make permanent changes to your original image. You never know when you might want to go back to the original. Way back in the day I made the mistake of downsizing a bunch of images for email and saving them as originals, not as copies. Later I wanted to make enlarged prints only to find that the shrunken images no longer had enough resolution. I also save my “master” files as .tif or .psd (Photoshop document) files that don’t further compress the image. .jpg files are good for images you are prepping for email or web because they are smaller. But each time a .jpg is saved, the image gets compressed again and loses some quality so it isn’t a good option for your “master” copy. If an original file from my camera is called IMG_4562.jpg, then I would probably save the enhanced copy as IMG_4562.tif, or IMG_4562copy.tif or IMG_4562crop.tif. I keep the same image number in the file name instead of giving it an entirely new name so I can always trace my “master” images back to their originals.
5. Use a piece of image browsing software like Bridge in Adobe Photoshop or a stand alone application like ACDsee to rank images and place them in categorized folders. Once you have done all the enhancing you’re going to do for the time being, it is time to move your images out of the “delete and edit” folders into your greater filing system so that you can find them again when you want them. Software designed for this purpose makes it fast and easy to create and name folders, move photos from folder to folder, rename photos and rank them in various ways for easy sorting and locating down the road.
6. Create a hierarchical folder filing system. Mine is based on geographical location and/or main subject matter. Dates and numbers don’t work well for me because it is difficult to pinpoint any one image to the date it was taken or to an unrelated folder number. In my system a folder path leading to a certain image might go something like this: Landscapes>Mountains>Oregon Cascades>Mt. Jefferson. Within the final Mt. Jefferson folder are…you guessed it…photos of Mt. Jefferson. In addition to “Mountains” my top level “Landscapes” folder also contains folders for Lakes, Deserts, Rivers, Valleys and so on.
7. Create as many subfolders as needed so there are never too many images in one folder. Instead of putting all 700 of my mountain photos in one huge “Mountains” folder, I break it down by mountain range and then by specific peak if necessary.
8. Use your image management software application to add keywords to your image metadata. This can be time consuming and tedious so I only recommend it if you plan on having many thousands of images in your archives. However, if you do, it can be a savior. Let’s say you have an image of a snow-covered mountain in winter. At the time you decide it fits better in the “Winter” folder instead of in the “Mountains” folder and a year later you’re pulling your hair out because you can’t find it. If you have added keywords that describe the image you can do a search for one or more of those keywords and let your computer quickly locate the image for you.
9. Use a back up system so if you have a hard drive crash all your photos are not lost. See my post on back up systems by clicking HERE.
10. For your best photos create one finished “print ready” file and then use that to size or crop for various uses. Don’t save multiple “master” versions of the same photo. It gets too confusing trying to keep track of them and it takes up memory. In a future Photo Tips feature I will explain preparing images for printing, email and other uses from your “master” in more detail.

Filed Under: Digital Image Editing Tips, Digital Photography Tips

Digital Projectors for Photographers

March 5, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw 4 Comments

Finding the right projector for presenting digital images can be tricky. There is a lot to discuss. The March 2007 issue of Outdoor Photographer Magazine just ran a several page article on digital projectors for photographers. I would recommend seeing if you can find a copy.

There are three main technologies used in digital projection LCD, DLP and LCOS. LCD projectors use transmitted light while DLP and LCOS projectors reflect light off of an array of thousands of microscopic mirrors. LCD projectors tend to have very good color saturation and image sharpness, but the image is broken into small visible squares or pixels. DLP projectors have a very seamless image with no apparent pixels. Both projectors have improved dramatically in recent years and either can offer a great image for projecting photos. LCOS projectors offer the best of both worlds with great color and sharpness and no square grid pattern. The trade off here is cost and larger, heavier equipment.
I have a Canon Realis. They have the highest resolution and best color on the market due to their LCOS projection system but they are also quite expensive ($3000 – $5000). There are many good LCD and DLP models out there for much less. When comparing projectors there are some key characteristics to consider. Contrast ratio is important. Look for 400:1 or 500:1 for an LCD projector (higher is better). For DLP projectors a contrast ratio of 2000:1 is good. How many lumens you need is another consideration. If you plan to use it in a completely dark room then fewer lumens (1000 to 1500) is OK. If you want to show during the day or in lighted rooms then you need more lumens (2000 or more). For good photo sharpness you want as much resolution as you can afford. Stay away from VGA (640×480 pixels) and SVGA (800×600 pixels). If you can afford XGA (1024×768 pixels) or SXGA (1280×1024 pixels) you will get a much sharper picture.

As a starting point you might want to Google the Canon LV-X6, Epson PowerLite 76c, ViewSonic PJ400 and the Sony VPL-EX3. The best way to decide on a projector is to go somewhere you can actually see and compare the projected images. However, most electronics stores like Best Buy or Circuit City tend to carry mostly home theater projectors or business presentation projectores. The former generally use wide screen format and are optimized for showing video and not still images with crisp detail. The latter are often lower resolution and best for showing large graphics, clip art and limited colors.

I almost always project images and multil media shows directly from my computer’s hard drive. If you want to play from DVD you have a few options. You can play from your desktop computer’s DVD player if you will alway be projecting at home. If you need to be portable, you can project from a laptop computer or you can use a dedicated DVD player to project images on DVD. If you are planning on creating slide shows with music, fades and titles then you will need some sort of editing software that can create the show. Microsoft Windows Movie Maker works pretty well for basics and comes with the system software in new PCs. Adobe Premier or Apple’s Final Cut Pro are top of the line. You will also need some sort of sound system as well. If you plan on only projecting from your home then everything is much easier. You can set up a permanent home theater with good sound and the size and weight of the equipment isn’t so crucial. If you want to take it on the road, then a laptop, small sound system and portable screen are essential.

Filed Under: Digital Photography Tips, Photography Equipment

Digital Photo Tip: Optimizing For Email

February 2, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw Leave a Comment

One of the great advantages of digital photography is the ability to easily share your photos with others. In addition to making traditional style prints, digital images can be posted on websites, uploaded to digital personal organizers, displayed on cell phones and emailed. In my business I email photos on a regular basis. I email photo submissions to publishers, proofs to commercial clients and archived image samples to stock photo buyers. But it isn’t just professional photographers who email lots of images. I also email shots of my kids to the grandparents and photos I took out skiing to my friends. Emailing digital images is most likely the number one thing that people using digital cameras do with their photos and yet many people don’t have a clue how to optimize their photos for best email performance.

         The most important consideration when emailing photos is image size, especially for those of us with dial-up Internet connections, but also for those with broadband. If you set your camera to take images at a size that’s right for email then they are too small to make good prints, but if you try to email full size images they take a long time to send and don’t even fit on the screen for viewing. The solution is resizing. Most cameras these days come with software that can easily help you resize your images for email. It is also easy to resize images in image editing software such as Adobe Photoshop. However you go about sizing your photos, here are a few tips that I follow to make sure that I’m not the guy emailing photos so large that they overfill inboxes, take several hours to download and can’t be viewed without scrolling around. These tips only apply to photos that are intended to be viewed on screen but not printed. Print size files need to be large to give good print quality.

First, I like to size my photos so they are about 500 pixels on the longest side and have a resolution of 72 DPI (dots per inch). This enables them to be viewed on smaller monitors and even within the email message window without opening them full screen. 72 DPI is important because that is about the maximum resolution that a monitor can show. Images for print often need 300 DPI or more, but this is a lot of extra information that doesn’t make the image look any better on the screen. A 300 DPI image that is 500 pixels on its longest side contains 16 times more data than the same size image at 72 DPI.

         Second, I save the resized images to be emailed with a different name in a separate email folder. This way I don’t change the original image file and I can safely delete the resized images from the email folder when I don’t need them any more without accidentally losing the originals.Â

Third, I save the email images as JPEG (.jpg) files and set the quality to medium (about 5 on the Photoshop scale) to compress the files even more. These steps ensure that I am emailing the smallest files possible and that they send quickly, don’t fill up all the space in someone’s inbox and can easily be viewed on screen.

         One more tip if you are using software like Photoshop is to apply unsharp mask (Filter>Sharpen>Unsharp Mask) to the final sized image before saving and sending it. When you downsize an image it loses some detail that can be brought back with a little sharpening. Good luck and happy emailing.

Filed Under: Digital Image Editing Tips, Digital Photography Tips

Digital Photography Tip: "Exposure Stacking"

February 2, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw 4 Comments

Have you ever had a problem trying to shoot a scene with a bright sky and dark foreground and finding that if you get the sky exposed right then the foreground is black, and if you get the foreground right then the sky is over exposed? This is especially common with sunrise and sunset photos. With film cameras the only real option is to try to balance the light in camera with split filters or holding a black card in front of part of the scene during long exposures to “hold back” some of the bright areas. Digital photography provides some new ways to achieve a balanced shot when the light range is too great. One way involves making two exposures of a scene and bringing them together in Photoshop that I call “exposure stacking”.

I employ some sort of “exposure stacking” technique in many of my landscape photos especially when the dynamic range of a scene or complexity of the skyline make use of graduated filters problematic. If you would like to try, follow these steps.

  1. Set up your camera on a sturdy tripod. Once you have framed your shot, lock everything down so there will be no unwanted movement.
  2. With the camera set to aperture priority or manual, take one shot at one to two stops above your meter reading. Now, without moving the camera, adjust the shutter speed to take another shot at one to two stops under your meter reading.
  3. Open both images in Photoshop and select the move tool on the tools pallet. Holding the shift key, drag the darker image on top of the lighter image. Holding the shift key will make the two images line up on top of each other.
  4. In the layers Pallet you will now see two layers, the light one on the bottom and the darker one on top. Make sure the top dark layer is selected and then click the “Add A Mask” button at the bottom of the layers pallet (it looks like a folder with a circle in it).
  5. Now select the brush tool on the tools pallet. Make sure that the foreground color on the tools pallet is set to black. With the brush opacity set to about 30% begin painting on the image mask. Everywhere you paint on the mask the top layer will be erased 30% at a time allowing the lighter bottom layer to show through. If you erase too much you can bring it back by setting the foreground color to white and painting over the erased areas to “un-erase” them.
  6. In this way you can bring out the lighter foreground exposure while leaving the sky appropriately exposed. It takes a little practice to get the best results and sharp edges along a light/dark boarder can be tricky, but this technique can make otherwise impossible photos possible. Give it a try!

Filed Under: Digital Image Editing Tips, Digital Photography Tips

Digital Photography Tip: Going Beyond The Auto Mode

February 2, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw 2 Comments

All but the most basic digital cameras these days give the photographer the ability to have some artistic control over their camera settings, something that is currently only found on more advanced film cameras. However, because of previous experience using “point and shoot” film cameras, most digital camera owners don’t ever stray from the full “Auto” setting. Many digital cameras offer preset shooting modes for portraits, landscapes and fill flash shooting, which is better than nothing, but the computer chip still makes all of the setting decisions taking much of the creativity out of the equation.

           Shooting in Aperture Priority (AV on most cameras) is an easy way to exercise some of your own vision in how a photo should look. Without getting too technical, the aperture setting determines how far the camera’s shutter will open when a photo is taken. Most basically, a large opening will let in more light while a small opening will let in less light. On auto the camera always chooses the aperture that lets in enough light to ensure a sharp photo. However, the aperture setting has a second function as well. A large opening decreases the “depth of field” or amount of the image that can be in focus at one time, while a small opening increases the “depth of field”.

           Say you want to get a nice portrait shot where the person’s face is in focus, but the background is pleasingly blurred. Set the camera for a large aperture, focus on the subject’s eyes and viola, you get professional looking portraits. Next you want to shoot a landscape with flowers in the foreground and nice mountains in the distance and you want everything to be in razor sharp focus. Set the camera for a small aperture and the depth of field will be wide enough to keep everything nice and crispy.

           That’s all there is to it. Well, actually not. There are a couple of tricky bits to keep in mind. First of all, the aperture settings are counterintuitive. The smaller the aperture setting (or f-stop) the larger the openning and vice versa. This means that if you want a large opening to get a shallow depth of field you need an f-stop of f/5.6 or lower. If you want a small opening for maximum depth of field you need a large f-stop. Many smaller digital cameras top out with an f-stop of f/8, but SLRs can go up to f/22 and higher depending on the lens being used. The second tricky bit is that as you decrease the size of the opening (by increasing the f-stop number) you reduce the amount of light coming in which makes the camera use a slower shutter speed. In low light or with very small apertures (like f/22) the shutter speed will be slow enough to require a tripod in order to get a picture that isn’t blurry.

           So, get off the Auto mode once in a while and nurture your creative nature with a little aperture control.

Filed Under: Digital Photography Tips

Digital Photo Tip: Tack Sharp

February 2, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw 3 Comments

Nature and landscape photographers have always aspired for highly focused and visibly “sharp” images. Digital photography has many of the same challenges and solutions as film for creating the sharpest images, plus a few additional ones as well. With any camera there are some tried and true ways to capture sharp images. Of course the quality of your camera’s lens and proper focusing techniques are major factors. Using a tripod to eliminate camera motion or vibration and shooting with the smallest possible aperture (shutter opening) to gain the greatest focal depth are two other time honored techniques for getting sharp images. For slow shutter speeds using a cable release or timer to activate the camera allows you to avoid touching it and causing vibrations. Higher end SLR cameras often have a mirror lock setting so that the viewfinder mirror can be locked before the shutter opens. The movement of the mirror in SLRs can cause enough vibration in the camera to affect sharpness at shutter speeds between about 1/10 of a second and 2 seconds.

All of these techniques work well with both film and digital capture. Digital cameras introduce some new considerations for creating sharp images, however. The human eye recognizes sharpness as crisp lines along edges. When digital cameras evaluate the information captured by their sensors and try to assemble it into a realistic picture there is a slight amount of blending of colors along edges making the image appear less sharp. When shooting in jpeg capture mode, most digital cameras will automatically apply some “digital” sharpening along edges to counter this affect. Many cameras allow the user to preset how much sharpening the camera will apply. If simple in-camera sharpening is what you are looking for, consult your user’s manual to find out how to adjust the amount of sharpening that is applied. When shooting in RAW capture mode, no sharpening is added to the image at all. Whether shooting in RAW or jpeg mode, I prefer to apply my sharpening later with photo editing software like Photoshop because it offers more control and better quality. There are many different digital tools for enhancing the sharpness of your photos. In Photoshop my favorite is “unsharp mask” found in the filters menu. It can be a little tricky to figure out, but I find that a higher amount (80-200) and smaller radius (.5 –1.5) with the threshold set to 0 or 1 works well for a final sharpening pass right before printing. You need to experiment a bit to get it right. To really see the effect of the sharpening, view the image at 100%. Be careful not to over sharpen giving your image unnatural halos and a plasticized look. When used to prepare an image for printing, email or web use, it is best to apply the unsharp mask filter at the end of the editing process. Resizing and making other adjustments after sharpening can decrease sharpness and even cause loss of quality. For this reason it is also important not to save an image with final sharpening applied. Instead, apply sharpening to fit the desired output size, purpose and use each time you print or email an image. Then close the image without saving it in its sharpened state, or save it with a new name if you plan to use it in that exact format again.

Â

Filed Under: Digital Photography Tips

Digital Photo Tip: Backing Up Your Digital Image Files

February 2, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw Leave a Comment

Whether you are a full time pro or the family photo historian, digital technology has changed the way we shoot and store photos. Digital cameras and electronic storage have us all clicking away, taking massive amounts of images and feeling largely free from the concerns of the costs of film and developing as well as needing to find space for boxes of prints or slides and having to throw out all of the duds. Once you own the equipment, shooting 1,000 shots isn’t any more expensive or wasteful than shooting one. Editing still takes time, but if you learn how to effectively use image management software, this time can be greatly reduced. Storage of large numbers of images is less of an issue with digital as well. No more need for volumes of photo albums or closets full of slides. Depending on the size of the digital image files and the size of the hard drive, thousands or even millions of images can be stored right in your computer.

With your entire collection of digital images stored on your hard drive, protecting against file corruption or hard drive failure is the new big issue that photographers have to consider. Over the past six or seven years of consumer digital camera development, storage and back up of digital image files has been a hot topic of discussion. For a while the trend was to utilize removable media, such as CD or DVD, to store and back up digital photos, but this is no longer seen as the best solution. CDs vary in quality. Some more expensive brands can last for decades, but cheaper ones can begin to break down in a matter of years. CDs also have limited storage capacity. A six-megapixel camera (a common size now available) can produce RAW files that are 18 megabytes when converted to TIFF. Only 38 of these images will fit on a CD. If you have thousands of images, the number of CDs needed to back up your collection becomes prohibitive. With rapid changes in technology the CD may go the way of the eight-track tape and the floppy disk in a few years, leaving you without a way to access your stored images. DVDs offer a bit more storage space, but even so a DVD can still only hold about 220 18-megabyte files. Additionally, DVDs are even less stable than CDs and have a maximum life of only several years, so they are not a good option for long-term storage.

So what is the best back up solution? Right now the experts are supporting the use of high capacity external hard drives. External hard drives are available in sizes ranging from 50 gigabytes up to several hundred gigabytes and are relatively inexpensive (about $1 to $2 per gigabyte). They are easily connected to your computer via high-speed USB 2.0 or FireWire connections and you can add as many as your computer has ports for. Files on an external hard drive are much more accessible than a collection of CDs or DVDs and they can still be edited, resaved and deleted as with any other hard drive. Hard drives store data magnetically, and this information can fade or become corrupted over time, but it is a fairly simple matter to recopy all the contents of a hard drive from time to time to “refresh” the stored data. As new storage technology emerges, transferring your image files from your old hard drive will be an easy matter. I use two 250-gigabyte external drives to house my photo collection. One is the primary drive that I work from and the second is a backed up mirror image of the first drive. Every few days I copy the contents of drive one to drive two. Then I can completely unplug drive two from my computer to protect it from crashes and surges and can even store it in a different physical location to protect it from fire or theft. Well-known manufacturers of external hard drives include Maxtor, LaCie and SimpleTech and can be purchased at retailers like Office Depot or Staples or your local computer dealer. Your digital photos represent the same kind of irreplaceable property that film once did. It is a good idea to make sure that your collection is properly stored and backed up.

Filed Under: Digital Photography Tips

Digital Photo Tip: Use Your Histogram

February 1, 2007 by Sean Bagshaw 1 Comment

Digital Photo Tip: Use Your Histogram

Producing a perfect exposure has been the Holy Grail for photographers since the dawn of photography. In times past, taking a properly exposed photo required lottery-winning luck or a degree in mathematics. Ansel Adams developed his zone system to enhance his chances of properly exposing his photos. More recently, hand held light meters and in-camera metering systems made it easier to determine the right camera settings for a given scene. Even still, there was always an element of guesswork and no way of knowing the exposure was correct until the film was developed. Photographers would often burn through tons of film bracketing their shots in hopes that at least one would be exposed correctly. With digital photography there is finally a much improved exposure tool; the histogram.

Today’s digital SLR cameras and even many mid to high-level fixed lens digital cameras have a histogram tool built into their functions. A histogram is nothing more than a basic bar graph. The histogram in digital cameras graphs the light captured when taking a photo. At first a histogram can be a bit cryptic, but with a little practice it is an easy and foolproof way of knowing if you have created a good exposure right after taking the shot.

The basics to understanding a digital camera histogram really are, well, basic. The colors a digital camera can “see” are assigned numbers from 0 to 255. Zero is black and 255 is pure white. On a histogram, the left side of the graph is 0 or black and the right side is 255 or white. The way to know that you have a good exposure is if all the information on the histogram falls within this range.

If any of the information is bunched at the left side of the graph and appears cut off on the left side the shadows have been underexposed and detail in the shadows has been lost.

histogram-1

dark
If a lot of the information is bunched up and cut off on the very right side of the graph this indicates that the highlights have been overexposed and there will be a loss of detail in the brightest parts of the image.

histogram-2

lioght
Once either side of the histogram have been “clipped” that data is missing from the image and can not be resotred. The good news is that it is easy to check the histogram when you take a shot allowing you to make the needed adjustments and take the photo again.

Even if all the image information is contained within the boundaries of the histogram, it is preferable to try to keep the bulk of the graph centered or even a bit to the right, as long as the graph doesn’t get clipped off indicating a loss of detail. The reason for this is that darker areas in a digital image are more susceptible to digital noise, especially when adjustments are made. Less noise is introduced adjusting a light image than adjusting a dark image.

Some people make the mistake of thinking that all their histograms need to be perfect bell curves. This isn’t the case since every scene has different proportions of dark, light and all the color in the spectrum. A shot of dark green trees will have more data on the left side of the graph than a shot of snow. The goal isn’t to have the histogram be a perfect curve as long as all the data remains within the histogram range.

So, how do you find your histogram? Consult your instruction manual. If your camera has a histogram it will appear on the LCD viewing screen when accessed. On some cameras it is found within the system of menus. On my cameras I access the histogram by pressing the “Info.” button on the back of my camera while I am viewing an image.

Filed Under: Digital Photography Tips

Photo Tip: Photographing Lightning

July 26, 2006 by Sean Bagshaw Leave a Comment

Photo Tip: Photographing Lightning

One of the aspects of outdoor photography that I really enjoy is the ability to create a visual record and often highly artistic imagery of awe-inspiring natural events. It takes perseverance, knowledge of the natural world, timing and a lot of luck to be in the right place to photograph an amazing atmospheric event or an exciting display of wildlife. If you do manage to be in the right place at the right time, then you need to be ready to execute the correct photographic techniques to properly capture the moment.

Lake Lightning I

I find that lightning is one of the most awesome natural phenomena to photograph. When bolts of lightning are frozen in time on camera we see everything that is happening during that microsecond flash of light, from the delicate structure of the branching current to the glowing cloud covered sky and illuminated landscape. In some areas of the Midwest and South good lightning storms are a regular summer occurrence, but here in the Pacific Northwest they can be few and far between and hard to predict.

When a good lightning storm does present itself around here the first trick is to be in the right location. Shots of lightning in an empty cloudy sky are OK, but they will be much enhanced if there is something else in the composition to add scale and drama. Try to find a location that has water in the foreground for a reflection, a cityscape or silhouettes of trees or mountains. It is important to be fairly close to the lightning so that it fills a substantial portion of the sky. Miniature bolts many miles off on the horizon are generally underwhelming and don’t properly illuminate the foreground. On the other hand, it isn’t wise to be directly in the path of the lightning for obvious safety reasons. I find a good balance of proximity and safety when I am able to position myself about one to three miles from where the lightning is striking, and I’m always ready to jump in the car and drive away if it gets too close.

Lake Lightning II

The second trick is to know the right technique to capture the show. I use essentially the same technique shooting lightning as I do fireworks. It is also a similar technique to using a handheld flash to walk around and illuminate foreground objects, like tents, in a night shot. In effect, lightning acts as a giant, unpredictable fill flash. With a lightning sensor on your camera to trigger the shutter it is possible to shoot lightning when the sky is less than completely dark and long exposures are not possible, but for shooting lightning without one it should be almost entirely dark. This enables you to leave your shutter open for as long as you need to capture several strikes without the danger of overexposing the scene. Find your location, set up your camera on a tripod and set it to shoot on the Bulb setting (this enables you to use a cable release to keep the shutter open for as long as you want). If your camera doesn’t have a Bulb setting, then set it to the longest exposure setting it has (probably 30 seconds) and hope that’s good enough. Then close the aperture down (f/11 or smaller) to get a good depth of field and to allow even longer exposure times. In the dark your auto focus won’t work so you will need to manually set the focus. If you can’t see enough to focus set the focal length to infinity and then back it off a small amount to make sure that the middle-foreground is still sharp. Now open the shutter and wait for several lighting strikes before closing it. In a storm with intense lightning you might get several strikes in less than a minute. For the images on this page the lightning was spaced out quite a bit so I had to leave the shutter open for six to eight minutes to capture several bolts. If you are shooting several minute exposures with a digital camera set it to the lowest ISO and use any noise reduction functions it may have to reduce the digital noise that comes with long digital exposures.

Experiencing the power and mystery of a lighting storm is exhilarating. Photographing it can freeze the experience in time and produce some amazing, all natural pyrotechnic art. Have fun and be safe.

Filed Under: Digital Photography Tips

« Previous Page

© 2026 · Sean Bagshaw Outdoor Exposure Photography